On 24-Jul-06, at 11:52 PM, Matt W wrote:
Does anybody else think that memory_get[peak_]usage() should work more like before? I would imagine it can be "fixed" fairly easily, though it probably needs another variable, and just a little extra overhead of inc./ dec. that
variable more often (but I think that was done in the old MM anyway?).

I think that the current, more precise memory usage indicator is the correct behavior and should not be changed.

Ilia Alshanetsky




Reply via email to