From what I know Edin uses VC++ 6.0 which works just fine for our
needs. So, I see no reason to move away from that unless someone can
present a really good reason why it should be done.
On 6-Jan-07, at 2:48 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Ilia,
weel 2002 aka 7.0 or 2003 aka 7.1 are pretty fine. We have left
behind
6.0 long ago :-)
best regards
marcus
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 5:44:55 AM, you wrote:
Edin,
Thanks for the detailed analysis and spending time analyzing the
issue. Based on what you've said I think our best option is to go
back to VC++ 6.0 for this release, we are too far along in the
release cycle to experiment with things. Perhaps for the next release
we can revisit the issue, assuming there an interest and a benefit of
using VC++ 8.0 can be quantified.
On 5-Jan-07, at 10:48 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
I looked around at other projects and everyone seems to be using
VC++
6.0 for their builds (Active state, apache, ...) which eliminates
all
the hassle with bundling C runtime, etc.
So I think the best thing for us would be to stick to the good old C
compiler for making the Windows distro.
Ilia Alshanetsky
Best regards,
Marcus
Ilia Alshanetsky
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
