Hello Stefan, the license rules are the same, get in contact.
Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 8:14:47 PM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, >> that's plain wrong what you wrote. First PHP license is OSI Approved and >> for that defintively does not violate any OSI recommendation. Besides that >> > We will see how OSI explains how a discriminating license can be OSI > approved. >> read the paragraph again and again. You will eventually find out that the >> act of disallowing to use the term "php" in any of their names to whomever >> by the php-group does not violate definition part 5. In fact that tells you >> that php-group must allow anyone to contribute, which they do. Noone has >> > I suggest that you read it again and again: > The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons. > This means the license MUST NOT have different rules for different kinds > of people. Those in favour of PHP Group and those not. >> any term in any license means some restiction that only applies to >> certain people. ups. >> > This is plain nonsense. Other licenses pretty much make it clear that > ANYONE has to follow the same rules. >> p.s.: Instead of discussing stuff that is better of with layers you guys >> should contribute to open source....in the spirit of open source... >> > The spirit of open source is NOT that those in favour of the PHP Group > can abuse the PHP Project for whatever they want. Like advertise their > own companies. > Stefan Esser Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
