Jeffery Fernandez wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:59, Wez Furlong wrote:
On 5/19/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just want to clarify this situation - either the maintainers are
temporarily busy and will continue working on their extensions or they
have to admit that they won't do it anymore, we'll mark the extensions as
orphaned and start looking for other maintainers.
I'm going to say it one last time: there are other maintainers.
I'm temporarily too busy, but we have other maintainers.
Please assign bugs to the other maintainers.
Jee guys, why don't we just have a status for each maintainer. That way if a
maintainer is busy with their personal life/work, their name will not show in
the assign to list and an other maintainer will get picked to be assigned
with the bug report. Wouldn't this avoid all this pointless discussion?
I don't see ANY reason bugs should be assigned by anybody other than the
person who is ACTUALLY working on it?
*IF* someone has time or has found a fix for a problem, THEY assign the bug to
them selves and put up the fix.
Someone else 'deciding' that so and so is going to fix such and such is simply
not practical unless that person is also PAYING to have work done - which is
not the case on PHP.
Requests for someone to LOOK at a particular bug could be made, but the
decision on assignment should only be made by the person DOING the work?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://home.lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
MEDW - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
