Hi all, On 5/26/07, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26-May-07, at 6:51 AM, Edin Kadribasic wrote: > Ilia, I would really like to know why you are not merging patches > to head? Unfortunately I don't have as much time to spend on PHP as I'd like and I focus my attention on the aspects of PHP I use and can tests using the dev environments I have. I do not have a ready PHP6 environment and do not have time to test thing with php6 code, with which I do not have as much familiarity. Rather then making commits that may break the builds or spending hours resolving conflicts I focus my attention on PHP5 where fixes and improvements have tangible benefits to users. That said the commits are all public and if someone who is more familiar with php6 code then I can merge them, it would be great.
Ilia has a good point here. All commits are public and he already said numerous times that he cannot merge his fixes to all branches (no matter the reasons :). For the record, for all extensions I maintain or co maintain, I have no problem to have to merge his fixes (I do it for zip, it has 4 branches!). I prefer to have fix for the stable tree shortly instead of waiting weeks. Maybe we can find other persons (I saw Tony's merge yesterday) to do it for other parts of PHP. It should not be a big problem. --Pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
