On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Christian Schneider wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > Well, our implementation is not namespaces, "packet" doesn't have any > > meaning in this case, so perhaps you have a better suggestion than > > "package" then? > > Just a quick reminder to everybody here: The feature is important, the > name (package or namespace) is less so.
Incorrect, a name for a feature should show what kind of functionality we implemented. Picking names just for marketing reasons "Oh see, PHP has namespaces" is a bad idea. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
