+1 and I think it's a good way for someone to get into the role. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilia Alshanetsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:07 AM > To: Steph Fox > Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stas Malyshev; PHP > Developers Mailing List; Pierre > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP_5_3 Branched > > I am a biased party here, so take this with a grain of salt ;-) > > First of all, I definitely think we need 2 release masters, for 5.X > tree given that there will be two active branches, at least for the > next few months, there is simply too much work for one person to do. > My suggestion was going to be (Lukas beat me to the punch with his > proposal) that I RM 5.3 release and ask someone new to take over the > 5.2 branch and within 1-2 releases of 5.3.0 have that person take > over 5.3 branch, once they are a bit more familiar with the process. > I do agree that having more people try their hand at being RM is a > very good idea and historically every minor/major release had a new RM. > > On 27-Sep-07, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote: > > >> To be honest I would like to have you as RM. You have the background > >> to take the right decisions and other can help when it comes to low > >> level technical or security issues. > >> From a management, feedbacks or compromises ready point of view, you > >> have already proven your abilities. > > > > Pierre definitely has a point here :) but what says Ilia? > > > > - Steph > > Ilia Alshanetsky > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
