On 10.11.2007 23:32, Gaetano Giunta wrote: > Checking dates, pecl 1.2.4 was released the day after php 5.2.4.
As I've already said, OCI8 and PHP releases are not synced. > I do not need to scan this list's archives to be sure that everybody involved > in the oci code knew quite well about the pending release of php, and > changing that single line of oci code where the version is stored would > not have been a huge deal. If there really was no certainty that the php > code would end up being the same as pecl 1.2.4, it could have been > tagged 1.2.4-dev or something like that... I don't understand what you're trying to say. Do you mean that all PECL maintainers should update their extensions before PHP release? > plus a 3 numbered version is very easy to assign to a lib (you know, > like a new param for a function bumps up the middle number, a fix - any > fix - bumps up the rightmost one etc... ) That is what $Revision$ CVS tag does, version number is totally different thing IMO. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
