On Feb 3, 2008 10:27 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good point but I admit that I never understood why our windows > > releases have been so different from the source releases, from a > > configuration point of view. Many default extensions are (were) not > > enabled. But that's not a big problem and can be easily fixed no? :) > > It's not a big problem so long as everyone agrees on what should be enabled > by default.
What should be enabled by default on windows should be the same as on linux (and the windows specific extensions like com), imho. > Assuming the aim is to have everything _not_ enabled by default move to > PECL, that's quite a big deal. That's another topic and I tend to disagree (more later on that). -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
