Could I just get a confirmation that the parent forwarding patch has been looked at? It seems to me that the patch makes parent:: work as one would expect when extending static methods, and would not cause any backwards compatibility problems. Why is add a function preferred?
Thanks, Joseph North On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To answer Stanislav's question yes, the forward_static_call patch will > > suffice my concerns with the current implementation. You did mention that > > you weren't a big fan of the name, I am not particularly attached to it > > either. If you (or anyone else) has better name in mind I would be happy to > > change it. > > Great. Could you just add a couple of tests - to both verify it works > and illustrate the idea? Then I guess it'll be ready to commit. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
