Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
So back to the original topic: In a 50:50 scenario I'd certainly give
more weight to people I know for contributing for a long time than
How about Rasmus and Andi? ;) They are both "aye"s.
I'm probably in the 'nay' camp, but purely because I can't see any reason to
take several years of existing code base and changing it. So as long as no one
is suggesting DROPPING the existing perfectly adequate syntax but rather just
adding something else to slow down processing then I can put up with that. The
accelerator will probably take care of any extra delays caused by all the
additional features that are being added but as soon as something comes up
that is detrimental to existing functional code?
I keep being told - "You don't have to use it" - so as long as that is the
case then I just have to live with the problems of trying to ready updates to
libraries that are not in formats that I am used to :(
PHP6 is going to break a lot of things but I hope THIS is not one of them?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
