On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 18:27 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > I must admit that I think it would be bad to delay 5.3 more and have > another beta because of this,
Well, according to Dmitry (didn't test it myself) this doesn't bring real improvements so I don't think it's needed. > however if possible I would be all for > having APC in RC1 next week :) This was asked on IRC multiple times and always said something along the lines "talk to the current APC maintainers and if they think it's worth propose to internals" as the current APC maintainers can judge stability and risks better and have a better knowledge about missing 5.3 support. But nobody seemed t be that interested. By looking at the bug tracker I see 63 open APC bugs including missing support for 5.3 features (http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=15901) and some crashes from that I think APC benefits from an independent release schedule. Additionally APC doesn't offer core functionality and will need configuration to be useful (temp path, shm method, segment sizes, ...) so I don't think the additional installation step is that much of additional trouble. johannes -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
