Hi, On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:20 -0400, Gwynne Raskind <gwy...@darkrainfall.org> wrote: >> README.SVN-RULES says >> >> 1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from trunk >> (aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant branches. >> >> which I've been following so far. > > That document is outdated. It's now (strongly) preferred that you use one of > the > various methods for multi-branch commits available in SVN, using merge or a > sparse checkout. Yes, I agree svn merge will work well. IIRC, though, it involves a leading commit for trunk (usually, or sometimes for some branch whatever) and then merged ones for other branches. Are such sereval commits OK?
Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
