At 10:21 24/03/2010, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 24.03.2010 01:16, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> For me it is a requirement before the code makes it into a released
> version of PHP, and I think many others think that way if past
> discussions are any indication. That's what RFCs are for - if people
> can just go ahead and implement their original thoughts without
> paying attention to feedback, why bother?
> Personally I think that the person pushing the code should be
> responsible for implementing the feedback to the RFC (or getting
> others to do it).
I think you're missing something.
I don't care if FPM is in or out of the core.
FWIW, I don't think it's a good start for a component that goes into
our distribution.
In this case I'm willing to take responsibility for doing the
conversion, but for the record, if someone proposes to put a
component into the PHP distro and refuses to implement the feedback
(not every last piece of anecdotal feedback, but the key points)
because it's not important enough in his view, I do think it should
preclude the component from being accepted. We have the RFC process
for a reason.
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
