Formality, in any of its forms, is about as far from PHP or this project as you could possibly get.
John On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Alec <alecgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > This could be good. A custom built site where people can vote for and > against (and maybe neutral) something and then post their reasoning. > > Open discussion could still take place on internals, but a site that would > provide a quick summary would be handy. So RFC wiki page + user registration > tied to an email (preferably the one used on internals) + voting. > > We are all PHP people, whipping something up shouldn't be too hard :D . > > On 9/15/2010 9:36 PM, James Butler wrote: >> >> This thought is brought on mainly by watching the annotations drama that >> is currently occupying internals, does anyone else agree it might be a good >> idea to have a slightly more formal procedure for requesting features and >> then recording votes pros, cons, side effects, etc. against it. It might do >> a fair bit to stop anecdotal talk of how many people actually want a >> feature, and stop the list retreading the same arguments over and over >> again. Have no idea just yet what this would look like, but an thinking >> something between launchpad and the current php wiki. >> >> -- >> James Butler >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
