On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:13, "André Rømcke" <a...@ez.no> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > >> Derick Rethans wrote: >> >>> Actually, Kalle just pointed out that it compiles just fine. In that >>> case, I think we should put it in trunk and in the 5.4 alpha. >>> >> >> As long as it is disabled by default and can easily be replaced by >> preferred alternatives ... eaccelerator is still working fine now that it >> has been upgraded to handle 5.3 ... although it would be nice to see some >> more up to date comparisons. Although I suspect in reality, the combination >> with database and other caching activity means that a straight comparison >> may be a little meaningless? Change the database and the figures are going >> to be different anyway ... so a straight comparison on non-database code >> would be a little more practical. >> > > +1. Being disabled by default was agreed on for "old 6.x" so should be for > 5.4 as well. +1 As long as it actually works as opposed to just compiling :) Zeev -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
