Laruence wrote:
I totally agree with you about bc break things,
but actully I don't think this proposal will bring a big bc break,
it's a new approach , but not a big change,
I am meaning that the old codes can work fine because rarely codes
depends on a negative length.
do you agree?
No
Having been caught several times when subtle 'little' changes like this have
caused a problem, I'd rather avoid the problem ... since a better alternative
does already exist?
( And if you must top post PLEASE switch off quoting altogether especially when
it does not honour the 'sig' stripping ... )
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
