On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > > On 8/17/11 3:15 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote: >> >> However, in my opinion the important part is to just make a decision the >> sooner, the better, as long as there are not too much creepy code out >> there (I don't know any and I can't imagine, that there is). Because >> functions with namespace are quite unhandy without autoloading and I >> don't think, that there is much use of it. > > We already made the decision, when we introduced the namespaces and made the > resolution order what it is now. And we considered all the variants and > discussed all the arguments brought here back then.
could you link the discussion about the function autoloading back then? I only found the namespace resolution discussion, but nothing about functions, except that they should fall back to the global namespace as we don't have/didn't have autoloaders for them. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
