it seems fedora had never bison 1.x http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1084
Am 02.09.2011 01:23, schrieb Pierre Joye: > It would be nice to get at least a little bit of the context before going in > any kind of arguing. > > For one the failing test happening after my commit was my mistake. It has > nothing to do with the bison versions but me having committed a wrong > expectf expression. However, the 1.x support was the reason why I made this > change. Instead of making it right I've updated my boxes with bison 2.x. > Lazy and better.1 > > That being cleared, anyone using 1.x will have noticed that the tests did > not pass. Fact is that it looks like I am the only tester using 2.x. Do you > have any example of supported systems still having only bison 1.x support? > > Also 1.x is 13 years old, I would very surprised to see anyone still using > such an old system with 5.3. > > Now, as stated earlier, my testing hosts do not have 1.x anymore and I won't > care about it anymore either. So basically nobody here takes care if it > anymore but let claim we do :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
