hi Stas, On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> This attitude only makes me lose a lot of time answering questions >> instead of focusing on actual RFC stability. I want to propose >> something stable, I do not want to be pressured about should the RFC >> exist or not. It only delays the real voting results. What I can do to >> address this? > > I would concentrate on cleaning up RFC and bringing it to some state that is > stable and that has some consensus behind it. Right now I see many people > are against it. So I would address the concerns raised (provided it's > possible), refine all unclear points and then maybe try again.
The RFC is actually clean and implements PSR-0, it has been discussed and approved by many PHP frameworks or projects. We are hiding ourselves in the sand if we don't see that. Arguing about PSR-0 is fine but that's not the place to do it. And as PSR-0 is already approved, poeple with issues should bring them in the PSR-0 discussion channel, for the next version of PSR. But blocking the only thing so many PHP projects have ever agreed on is a major mistake. And it is a political and religious choice (religious as in "php does not enforce standard"). Even for something that does not enforce anything if not used. And as far as I can see, the RFC is approved as of now. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
