On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> I mentioned this before, and I remembered yesterday when David updated the
> README.RELEASE_PROCESS:
> http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=319009 :
> Currently bugs.php.net uses the qa.php.net api to decide which PHP branch
> are active, so what version should be listed for the bugreports.
> As we didn't have any specific api listing the active branches, I guessed
> that the active branches will always have an active qa version.
> This assumption failed with the release of 5.3.7 when Johannes updated the
> next qa version to be 5.3.8, but active => false
>
> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/web/qa/trunk/include/release-qa.php?r1=314792&r2=315141
> This made the 5.3 versions disappear from the version list at bugs.php.net
> :
> http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg52793.html
> (check the thread or at least my comments)
> As I mentioned there, always having an active qa release for the active
> branches should fix this issue (there is no need having a release, just
> having it active), something like this:
> 'X.Y.Z' => array(
> 'active' => true,
> 'snaps' => array(
>  'prefix' => 'phpX.Y-latest',
> 'baseurl' => 'http://snaps.php.net/',
>  ),
> ),
>
> this seems to be suggested by philip also (I don't know his rationale):
> http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=316012
>
> So we can either agree on this (and then I can revert
> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/web/php-bugs/trunk/include/php_versions.php?r1=315166&r2=315165&pathrev=315166
>  )
> and update the README.RELEASE_PROCESS to reflect this (adding the upcoming
> version as active on each stable release and not
> adding/removing/inactivating it when we EOLing a branch/major.minor version)
>
> I hope this clears up the situation.
>
> ps: having an api for getting the active branches would be still a
> cleaner, more straightforward solution.
> that would be easy to implement ( returning an array in json from a config
> file).
>
> --
> Ferenc Kovács
> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>

bump

-- 
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Reply via email to