So long as that release note clarifies that this patch has NOT yet gone through the QA cycle and that, therefore, you use it at your own risk; then I have no objection to that approach.
--Kris On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Adam Harvey <ahar...@php.net> wrote: > On 25 February 2012 04:02, Gustavo Lopes <glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:57:50 +0100, Stas Malyshev < > smalys...@sugarcrm.com> > > wrote: > > > >>> If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be > >>> included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4 > >>> doesn't even support the latest Apache". > >> > >> > >> Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :) > >> [...] > >> > >> > >>> > >>> There is a patch attached to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61172 > >>> It needs review and wider testing. > >> > >> > >> [...] > > > > > > In any case, I think a release note pointing to this issue and the > > provisional solution would be a good idea. > > +1. Release note + link to the patch (and a request for people who > have it work/not work to give feedback) is fine, I think. > > Adam > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
