On 09/03/12 02:05, Adam Harvey wrote: > On 9 March 2012 00:11, Remi Collet <r...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> Le 08/03/2012 09:03, Michael Wallner a écrit : >>> Sorry for the delay, but I already explained the issue in >>> the bug report: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61291 >> Thanks, for the explanation. > I'm still concerned about the idea that the output of a hash function > would change from one minor release to another, frankly, whether the > old output was right or wrong. That seems like the sort of thing users > would rely on being very, very stable.
It'd be worse to keep the wrong behavior, providing as tiger what it is not. What can be done is to add a "tiger192,3-broken php5.4" hash for BC of those which may have used the new one. It's serious enough so I'd consider it a factor for a new minor in short time, but not for setting in stone a wrong behavior. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
