Stas Malyshev wrote: > And if we had rule of "no failing tests", we'd have no > releases for years now, because nobody is fixing those tests and bugs > behind them.
I was about to suggest that maybe PHP should have a rule: "no release with failing tests". What's the point of a test that fails (or XFAILs)? Either something is broken - then it should be fixed. Or the test makes no sense - then it should be removed. Yes, I realize this is a simplistic view and things are more complicated in practice. But since, as stated, PHP is paying more attention to tests now (which is a good thing!), maybe it's time to take this one step further. bye, Dirk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
