Hi, 2012/4/13 Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>: > Hi! > >> If I exclude current code, then introducing script only include will be >> preferred one. I preferred dedicated statement for it though. >> >> include >> include_once >> require >> require_once >> script >> script_once > > I have a thought here. To implement script/script_once you don't need it > to be a language construct. A function would do just as fine. Why not > make an extension having these two functions, put it on PECL and see if > people will be using it? > For extreme adopters, you could even make php.ini switch that overrides > include/require and redirects them to your script functions. Shouldn't > be impossible to do, I think.
Good idea. I think it's possible as a Zend engine module. It may be possible as normal module if compiler hook can be used. I guess it is now. It provides optional security by accident. (Someone called LFI syntax error an accident and I like it) I wish the other RFC author implement this. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
