On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita....@googlemail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Rick WIdmer <vch...@developersdesk.com> > wrote: > > On 4/16/2012 1:02 PM, Kris Craig wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Rick > >> WIdmer<vch...@developersdesk.com>wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> More important include doesn't currently allow multiple parms: > >>> > >>> include "foo.bar", 'baz'; > >>> > >>> Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ',' in bla.php on line xx > >> Regarding include/require, I agree that any BC break would be extremely > >> minimal. In the 10+ years I've been developing PHP, I don't think I've > >> ever once seen somebody include multiple scripts on a single line (I > >> wasn't even aware that such a thing was allowed). > > See above. It is not allowed now. > > I think there is a misunderstanding here. Inclusions with two > arguments are currently not allowed, yes. The point is that adding > such a second argument would make the grammar ambiguous. > > E.g, consider this: > > func(include 'foo', $someThing); > > Currently this is interpreted as the return value of 'foo' and the > variable $someThing being passed to func. > > If you add a second argument it's unclear what this does. Is this a > two-argument include? I.e. should it be interpreted as > > func((include 'foo', $someThing)); > > Or is this a one-argument include and should be interpreted as > > func((include 'foo'), $someThing); > > In my eyes such an ambiguity renders any proposal to add another > argument to include completely unacceptable. > > The only option is to add a dedicated syntax for it like > > include 'foo' as $flags; > > Nikita > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > Hmm I like that idea. Anyone see any downsides to using "as" instead of comma delination? --Kris
