Including Wordpress in your test does sound fairly realistic actually, but it's a good sign that something else becomes the bottleneck with APC enabled (:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Saleh <msaleh...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for the feedback Tom. > > I actually created a simulated test with jmeter and wordpress and was > testing that with and without apc (simulation of a set of authors and > readers). > Once I turned on APC, I realized my db server became a bottleneck and I was > not able to test the max throughput. > > Your scenario removes the db and focuses strictly on the cached pages, so I > will give that a try. > > Thanks and if there are any other suggestions, please do let me know! > > - Mohammad > >> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:38:56 -0400 >> From: t...@punkave.com >> To: internals@lists.php.net >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC benchmark > >> >> You might be better off testing a nontrivial case like a framework >> based web application's homepage with and without APC turned on for >> 100 fetches. That's where APC really shines. >> >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Mohammad Saleh <msaleh...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > All, >> > >> > I was looking for a standard benchmark script that I could run with and >> > without apc caching to see the general gains. >> > Is there something that is used by the internals team for such tests? >> > If not, are there any recommendations? >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Mohammad >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Tom Boutell >> P'unk Avenue >> 215 755 1330 >> punkave.com >> window.punkave.com >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> -- Tom Boutell P'unk Avenue 215 755 1330 punkave.com window.punkave.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
