Am 27.08.2012 um 03:55 schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com>:
[...]
> And we aren't just C89 anymore actually. We still try to stick to it
> when possible, but for example in the intl extension you will find C++
> and it won't build without it. The idea there is that any small embedded
> platform that may still only have C89 support is unlikely to link
> against the massive ICU library.
> 
> But we may be at the point where even tiny embedded platforms have
> better compiler support and we don't need to stick to C89 anymore.

If I understand Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99) correctly, C99 is 
not at all supported in MS Visual C++ (except non-standard extensions like 
__inline or __forceinline). So C99 might not be a good candidate for us just 
now. But I'm sure Pierre has more on that issue.

With regards,
Lars
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to