Am 27.08.2012 um 03:55 schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com>: [...] > And we aren't just C89 anymore actually. We still try to stick to it > when possible, but for example in the intl extension you will find C++ > and it won't build without it. The idea there is that any small embedded > platform that may still only have C89 support is unlikely to link > against the massive ICU library. > > But we may be at the point where even tiny embedded platforms have > better compiler support and we don't need to stick to C89 anymore.
If I understand Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99) correctly, C99 is not at all supported in MS Visual C++ (except non-standard extensions like __inline or __forceinline). So C99 might not be a good candidate for us just now. But I'm sure Pierre has more on that issue. With regards, Lars -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php