On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Lars Strojny <l...@strojny.net> wrote:

> Hi Pierre, hi Will,
>
> Am 03.09.2012 um 13:57 schrieb Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com>:
>
> > hi Will,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Will Fitch <wfi...@meetme.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Ryan McCue <li...@rotorised.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> As far as I can tell, there's no standard which uses the Olson database
> >>> to specify the timezone, so we'd have to create one.
> >>>
> >>> What about ISO8601 with the Olson timezone suffixed?
> >>>
> >>>    2012-09-02T18:17:36+0100 (Europe/London)
> >>>    2012-09-02T18:19:05+0100 (Africa/Niamey)
> >>>
> [...]
> >
> > I don't think you will ever get a consensus on that. The reason is
> > that this case falls in the same fall than the timezone itself (but
> > per instance of an object instead of globally).
> >
> > I'd to suggest to force the definition of a format using the
> > setStringFormat (or whatever will be the name of this function).
> > __toString will then fail if no format has been set, warning and
> > returns NULL (f.e.).
>
>
> I don’t agree here, especially if we recap what the proposed purpose of
> the __toString() method was:
>
>   Ease debugging by allowing "echo $date;" instead of "echo
> $date->format(...);"
>
> An additional constraint to make sure users use it for debugging and
> nothing else, would be:
>
>   Not allow changing the format, neither by ini setting or any other
> global means (incl. setters)
>
> To achieve that, we need a time format that is best for debugging,
> meaning, as lossless as possible. While ISO8601 comes pretty close it
> misses out on the Olson timezone suffix. I would second the notion of
> creating our own format and standardizing it internally with it’s own
> constant and DateTime doing the right thing if passed to the constructor.
> Additionally to what Ryan proposed, microseconds should be part of it
> (which ISO allows). So, here we go:
>
>   2012-09-02T18:17:36.12345+0100 (Europe/London)
>

Hi, Lars - there wouldn't be a need for the offset if the string provides
the timezone name.  Parsing this wouldn't be an issue, however, it would be
harder to sell this approach to others.


>
> Following this, the change would be fairly easy (adding a constant, a bit
> parsing fu and the toString() method).
>
> cu,
> Lars

Reply via email to