On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Etienne Kneuss <col...@php.net> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: >> Etienne Kneuss wrote: >>> >>> I can understand why we might not want that in PHP in order to >>> simplify the implementation, but it we follow logical reasoning I >>> can't see why we shouldn't implement that. >> >> >> With a decent IDE you don't need any of this overhead anyway. When you see >> the sorts of increase in time taken to do things why wouldn't you move as >> much as you can OUT of the core runtime code anyway? >> > > Please do not hijack this thread, we are not discussing whether or not > accessors should be implemented, but how.
To be perfectly clear, by "why we shouldn't implement that" the "that" means being able to implement an interface with accessors using plain properties. > > Best, > >> -- >> Lester Caine - G8HFL >> ----------------------------- >> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact >> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk >> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ >> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk >> Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > > > > -- > Etienne Kneuss > http://www.colder.ch -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
