On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi,
>
> What does that have to do with the initial question?
>
> It is getting really annoying to see you hi jack every single thread
> in this list with totally off topic and lengthy replies. It does not
> matter if what the questions raised are important or not, they are off
> topic.
>
> We do not, and do not want to, discuss CS or any other topics
> discussed, proposed or decided by the FIG group but how we can better
> cooperate and how it can be done.
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> <nip>
> > standard are you using' :(
>
>
>
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye
>
>
Steering things back to the original topic, my objections to collaboration
with FIG seem to be pretty much centered around their edictal approach to
userland style guidelines and how our involvement could be construed as an
endorsement of said style.  If they would agree to make some modifications
to this approach, I'd probably be able to withdraw my objection entirely.

Lars, if you're open to that (keeping in mind that you don't speak for them
of course), send me an email and let's see if we can brainstorm a solution
off-list.  =)

--Kris

Reply via email to