hi Derick, On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Pierre Joye wrote: > >> hi Derick, >> >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: >> > Commit: 7c74531e884aaa0a0bf6db76adb0e203cdb81c02 >> > Author: Derick Rethans <git...@derickrethans.nl> Mon, 17 Dec >> > 2012 16:35:52 +0000 >> > Parents: d4acb579df4c78acaaff3e90698277e62aac2222 >> > Branches: immutable-date >> > >> > Link: >> > http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commitdiff;h=7c74531e884aaa0a0bf6db76adb0e203cdb81c02 >> > >> > Log: >> > Added a test case for DateTimePoint. >> >> I think the way you deal with date is not correct. there were many >> voices saying that DateTimePoint was not a good name. > > That's why I have changed it to DateTimeImmutable.
Right, however my point remains. There was no concensus and a RFC would make a clear choice. Easy, simple, open. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
