On 02/25/2013 04:33 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
When it comes to changing syntax, there is no such thing as too small
of an RFC IMO. Runtime changes can occasionally be hand-waved, but
syntax changes are serious business.
Seeing this quoted makes me realize I expressed myself poorly. What I
meant to convey was:
When it comes to syntax changes, there's no such thing as too small of
a change to need an RFC.
Which I think most parsed out correctly, but I want to be clear on
that position. Bugfix or not, a parser change is a parser change.
It is actually great to see support for the RFC process.
Any new RFC page created in the wiki will get a bigger template than
previously provided. It looks like: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/template.
(Also see https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64256 about updating the
template). Whether it actually helps improve the quality of RFCs
remains to be seen.
Chris
--
christopher.jo...@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd
Newly updated, free PHP & Oracle book:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
