On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:15 AM
> > To: Pierre Joye; Dmitry Stogov
> > Cc: Christopher Jones; Matt Ficken; internals@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows
> >
> > > > Did you experiment with any options?
> > > > Putting the date of your O+ snapshot would also be handy.
> > >
> > > Latest from here are used:
> > > http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/snaps/Optimizer/7.0.0-dev/
> > >
> > > Dates are included. It would be nice to have it in the report as well,
> > > but we always use latest revision. It would however be much easier if
> > > there were PECL releases.
> > >
> > >
> > +1
> > Dmitry, is there any objection against creating a pecl release?
> > Could you tag the first version?
>
> The current vote that's going on right now deals with putting the extension
> into PHP itself.  If that happens (which seems awfully likely at this
> point), why do we need it in PECL?  We'd very much rather invest our very
> limited cycles into the code itself.  We're probably roughly a week away
> from having builds as a part of the PHP 5.5 snaps.
>
> Zeev
>

I see.
so no O+ for <5.5?
having a pecl release would be a small amount of work, which I would glad
to help with.

-- 
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Reply via email to