On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:15 AM > > To: Pierre Joye; Dmitry Stogov > > Cc: Christopher Jones; Matt Ficken; internals@lists.php.net > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows > > > > > > Did you experiment with any options? > > > > Putting the date of your O+ snapshot would also be handy. > > > > > > Latest from here are used: > > > http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/snaps/Optimizer/7.0.0-dev/ > > > > > > Dates are included. It would be nice to have it in the report as well, > > > but we always use latest revision. It would however be much easier if > > > there were PECL releases. > > > > > > > > +1 > > Dmitry, is there any objection against creating a pecl release? > > Could you tag the first version? > > The current vote that's going on right now deals with putting the extension > into PHP itself. If that happens (which seems awfully likely at this > point), why do we need it in PECL? We'd very much rather invest our very > limited cycles into the code itself. We're probably roughly a week away > from having builds as a part of the PHP 5.5 snaps. > > Zeev >
I see. so no O+ for <5.5? having a pecl release would be a small amount of work, which I would glad to help with. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu