On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> > wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> May I ask why you agreed to move sqlite away? That is a very close > >> situation (well, better as sqlite library status was way better than > >> current c-client). > > > > There's sqlite3, but nothing like this for imap. If there were another > > superior imap extension it would be different business. > > There is no way to migrate sqlite databases to sqlite3 without doing > it manually. So this point is totally irrelevant. > > Also imap will be available via pecl, no issue. Shared hosters won't > update before 2016 anyway, for the 1st ones. > > I think we cover the main points. > > There are no really new possible arguments. I will write the RFC early > next week and then ask for vote 2 weeks later. Thanks for your > feedback. > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > did you ever sent that mail? -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
