>The functionality provided is uncommon but perhaps usefu. However, I am
>*very* against the name `map` which has a very established meaning in the
>programming world; others have already mentioned this but I felt I should
>mention it again.

I'd like to note that I am not married to the name. If there is a better way 
to reference what the function is doing then that could be the name 
then by all means it should be used. 

Reply via email to