Hi Sean, thanks for your answers.
Am 08.08.2013 um 02:54 schrieb Sean Cannella <se...@fb.com>: > It does in the sense the same way as the current mode "enforces" types on > properties. That is, there's no guarantee that types will remain as > initially set, only that the values passed to the constructor must be X > type, ergo the post-ctor values of the props will be of type X. I can see > the argument that it suggests real (permanent) typing where none exists > though. [...] Makes sense. Given that, I don’t feel the shorter syntax is worth the WTF :) cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
