On 2014-08-12, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: >> On 12 Aug 2014, at 17:53, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: >>> Voting is open: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/switch.default.multiple#vote >> >> I’m all for this, but the *minimum* discussion period is *two* weeks. >> > The two-week period is advisory and we don't need to get hung up on > process for the sake of process. There's been no meaningful > discussion in the past week because nobody thinks this is remotely a > bad idea. Hell, some have questioned why this was put into an RFC in > the first place. (It's arguably a bug, since the existing behavior > could never have been described as right or intentional). > > If you're so worried about violating RFC process, I can revoke it > entirely and just commit it without voting, and I'd be completely in > the right. Or, we can apply a reasonable amount of process without > getting hung up on seven days worth of... no discussion whatsoever. > > -Sara
I agree with Sara here. The process if for human and not for it's own sake. Trivial and non-controversial changes like this really don't need the nitpicking which is going on. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
