On Aug 23, 2014 11:55 AM, "Dmitry Stogov" <dmi...@zend.com> wrote: > > 100% agree with RFC. > It would be great if technical improvements wouldn't be messed with this > renaming :(
You realize that 80%+ of the zval macros has to be changed as well right? And not only the name but the argument and their content. I won't battle for this naming, but seriously the arguments listed on this thread are amusing... Cheers, Pierre
