On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm planning to release 5.6.0 from RC4 if nothing serious comes up, so >>> this is just a heads-up: if you think that there is some fix, which should >>> make into the 5.6.0 final (which isn't in RC4) or if you think that there is >>> some blocker issue which should be solved before the 5.6.0 final release, >>> please drop me an email just to be sure. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> Ferenc Kovács >>> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu >> >> >> Hi, >> >> it seems that we have a blocker: >> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67694 >> >> ps: thanks to Florian for pinging me about it, I missed this one :( >> >> >> -- >> Ferenc Kovács >> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > > > Kudos for Tjerk for the quick fix, which seems a rather small one-liner fix, > so I'm not sure to release another RC based on RC4 plus the security fixes, > the proper fix for https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67865 and with the fix > for https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67694, or to release the final version > based on RC4 + reverting > http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commit;h=e4ff7f2ee346d641715694209e61704c9e815483 > (which introduced https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67865) and with the fix > for https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67694. > Julien what do you think?
I'm more in favour of releasing a GA. So, RC4 + sec fixes (that's OK) + revert of e4ff7f2ee346d641715694209e61704c9e815483 (done in last 5.4 and 5.5 releases) + fix for #67694. That's the safest path to have a GA soon (we are late) and on a stable code basis. Then we'll start our classical support plan, and have a 5.6.1RC1 in two weeks. Julien.Pauli -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
