On 20 Sep 2014 04:15, "Kris Craig" <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: >
> > From what I can tell, there are valid arguments to be made for both, so I > would love to see some discussion/debate here regarding which solution > should be implemented, as I'm currently undecided. Also please feel free > to point out any areas of improvement for the RFC itself. > Functions don't throw E_ERROR on missing argument. And ANY is about as bad as MX.
