On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> phpdbg is under php.net ; every decision about phpdbg should then be
>> debatted with all the team, and new ideas, such as a protocol, RFC'ed,
>> whoever are the maintainers of the code. It's like that for every
>> piece of code, of every extension. This is PHP process. If you dont
>> want to
> Do I understand it right that after all we've being discussing here
> about not putting big new stuff into PHP without discussion, we've got
> new stuff in phpdbg now merged not only to master but into the stable
> branch of 5.6? Am I missing something here?

If you are talking about the phpdbg new debugging protocol : this is right.

I think it clearly lacks discussion, RFC, concensus here, particularly
regarding the choice of the protocol.

We must absolutely use something open and efficient.
Using a closed protocol, that only one editor would be able to
implement ; is just a no-go ; for example.


Julien.P

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to