Hey Florian, > On 16 Dec 2014, at 19:55, Florian Margaine <flor...@margaine.com> wrote: > > Hi list, > > I think having a minor PHP version for the only sake of adding E_DEPRECATED > is kind of pointless to be honest. Historically, PHP (or other languages > for the matter, I'm thinking of python) minor versions have brought new > features. Adding notices is not a reason for a new version imho. > > If what we want are notices, and helping people to migrate to PHP 7, then > we can create tools for this. For example, python made a tool to help with > the transition of python 2 to python 3. Go did the same for 0.x to 1.0, if > my memory serves right. The point of new versions is to include new > features or bug fixes for the language, static analysis can be done with > external tools. > > The fact that we'll have to maintain one more version is also not something > to be taken lightly, especially when I see examples of how things progress > in php-src. (I'm thinking about the recent contributor who gave up.) > > Now, if the reason people want PHP 5.7 is to extend PHP 5 lifetime, then > it's another matter, and the lifetime of existing versions could be > extended. > > Just my $0.02. > > Cheers, > Florian Margaine
Hmm, actually, a 2to3-esque tool and a formal extension of 5.6's support by a year sounds like a better solution. If others agree, I might withdraw this RFC. Thanks! -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
