On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Florian Margaine <flor...@margaine.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 17 déc. 2014 09:54, "Ferenc Kovacs" <tyr...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > while readon through > http://www.garfieldtech.com/blog/on-drupals-leadership, > > I've realized that there is a bunch of similarities between php internals > > and drupal (which isn't that surprising), so I thought they guys around > > there perceive the challenges/problems and the different possible > solutions > > for those. > > > > I haven't read the article yet, but there is a fundamental difference > between Drupal and php: Drupal has a BDFL. > you should check out the article, Larry also goes into details about the topic, and how Drupal seem to try avoiding focusing to much power in one hand and potential abuse which also has negative effects (lack of clarity and the fear of making decisions). relevant parts are: "A good formal structure offers something that an informal structure cannot: Clarity. If a new contributor wants to ask someone in a "leadership" position if what they're proposing is consistent with the project direction, goals, or software design, who should they ask? Me? Gábor? catch? xjm? Daniel Wehner? Tim Plunkett? Angie Byron? Alex Bronstein? chx? Dries himself? Depending on the question the answer could be very different; even among those "leaders" I doubt there's consensus on which of them to ask, much less what the answer should be. That's actively hostile to new contributors, because then they don't know if what they're suggesting (be it big or small) would even be accepted until it's committed (and occasionally not even then <https://www.drupal.org/node/147723#comment-562659>). That is, it makes most contributions spec work, even for those in de facto leadership positions."
and "If the movement continues deliberately to not select who shall exercise power, it does not thereby abolish power. All it does is abdicate the right to demand that those who do exercise power and influence be responsible for it. If the movement continues to keep power as diffuse as possible because it knows it cannot demand responsibility from those who have it... it insures that the movement is as ineffective as possible." really interesting read. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
