Hi Pierre and Levi, On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > > Hi Simon and Levi, > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Simon J Welsh <si...@welsh.co.nz> > wrote: > > > >> The tests have it after the use(): > >> > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/997/files#diff-e306c6e99612ba59b00a4fe435b287e5R9 > >> > >> This was discussed in depth a couple of times in the related threads. > >> > > > > Thank you for the information. It should be in the RFC. IMHO. > > I feels natural to have type spec after function parameter definition > > rather than > > after "use". > > Please do not change the RFC during votes phase, or re start it. > > If many of the voters feel like they were voted on something different > of what is being discussed here, it may be a good thing to restart it. > However I think we all understood it as it is described in this > thread. Let update it after the votes or for the docs. Sounds good to me. Let's update the RFC after vote. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
