I will clarify the benefits of the keyword. Single instance of the class can reused in different contexts calls.
<?php class A { public $object; } class B { public $object; } class C { public function getCaller() { return caller::class; } } $a = new A; $b = new B; $c = new C; $a->object = $c; $b->object = $c; $a->object->getCaller(); // return A $b->object->getCaller(); // return B $c->getCaller(); // Fatal Error - undefined caller context ?> 2015-01-30 5:50 GMT+02:00 Juan Basso <jrba...@gmail.com>: > Usually it is solved sending the $this instance to class C constructor and > C object storing it in some attribute, solving the problem. I don't think a > new keyword would help. > > Juan Basso > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:53 PM, S.A.N <ua.san.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The reason for creating circular references, usually due to the need to >> bind objects. >> >> But this relationship can often be obtained from the context of the call. >> >> It will be very convenient to have a keyword that will return reference to >> an object, which caused this object. >> >> Sorry for my English, I'm not a native speaker. >> A simple example below shows the behavior that we need. >> >> <?php >> >> class A >> { >> public function __construct() { >> $this->object = new C; >> } >> } >> >> class B >> { >> public function __construct() { >> $this->object = new C; >> } >> } >> >> class C >> { >> public function getCaller() { >> return caller::class; >> } >> } >> >> $a = new A; >> $b = new B; >> $c = new C; >> >> $a->object->getCaller(); // return A >> $b->object->getCaller(); // return B >> >> $c->getCaller(); // Fatal Error - undefined caller context >> >> ?> >> >> Create a new keyword can cause problems with backward compatibility... >> Perhaps you can solve a problem to using an existing keyword? >> >> Thank you for any feedback. >> > >