The solution D uses is allowing the programmer to declare the name of the
return value like, we could do something like:
public function method()
return ($result) ($result <= 10 && $result >= 0) {
return 5;
}
If you didn't need the result, were working with a scope variable, or maybe
even a param taken by reference:
public function method()
return ($expr) {
/* ... */
}
I'm not keen on __CONSTANTS__, it's long, and if you have the choice to
name the variable you have the option of making the expression ...
expressive ...
Cheers
Joe
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote:
> I think __RETURN__ is better than $ret.
>
> Dmitry.
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Patrick Schaaf <p...@bof.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 10.02.2015 09:29 schrieb "Dmitry Stogov" <dmi...@zend.com>:
>> >
>> > I cnahged $> into $ret, because $> just won't work. Some better
>> solution is welcome.
>>
>> Also think $> would be awful. Don't like $ret either. What about a magic
>> constant __RETURN__ or __RESULT__? This would stand out very well when
>> glancing at the expression, would fit in with naming of other magic
>> constants, and might even be made to work in finally blocks, where the same
>> need for access to the returned value exists.
>>
>> best regards
>> Patrick
>>
>
>
