> http://dlang.org/deprecate.html#invariant as an alias for immutable
It's not an alias, the most recent compiler emits an error if you try to use invariant contracts, and immutable isn't a kind of contract. immutable is a property modifier: immutable: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/7e724b599640 invariant (won't compile using latest release): http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/102c5c5adef5 > Isn't invariant good enough? Good enough for us, yeah. Cheers Joe On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org> >> wrote: >> >>> So it turns out that invariant is already deprecated in D, they have >>> dropped it in favour of immutable properties. >>> >>> I guess I'll have to install an old version, or try to extract >>> everything we need from their obviously outdated documentation ... >>> >> >> That's too bad. >> Eiffel uses invariant. >> >> https://docs.eiffel.com/book/method/et-design-contract-tm-assertions-and-exceptions >> > > http://dlang.org/deprecate.html#invariant as an alias for immutable > > I think D folks would like to be more strict. Object is great, but state > management can be complex. > I like immutable also since it prevents modification by mistake. I'm not > sure if we should go for it > without having invariant. Even if we have invariant, we may have immutable > object/scalar in the future. > Both are good. > > Isn't invariant good enough? I don't think Eiffel will drop invariant > support in favor of immutables. > > Regards, > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > yohg...@ohgaki.net >
