Le Wed Feb 18 2015 at 19:10:08, François Laupretre <franc...@php.net> a écrit :
> > De : Patrick ALLAERT [mailto:patrickalla...@php.net] > > > > The biggest advantage, IMHO, is that you get the exact same result > whether > > you do: > > > > foo((int) $value); > > > > or: > > > > foo($value); > > > > ... whatever the mode you are in. > > Wrong. Parameter parsing rules are much more restrictive than casting > rules. > > Only 'foo((int)'orange')' would (erroneously) succeed. > Francois, I'm very aware of the distinction between cast mechanism and ZPP, but I obviously haven't been clear about the fact that the (conversion|coercion|type juggling|...) reporting configuration I proposed would have to be used in ZPP *AND* casting mechanism (and anywhere else where some conversion applies). With: $value = "foo"; foo((int) $value); it is: "(int) $value" that would generate a warning/error depending on the reporting, not while parsing the parameter of function foo(), which would receive an int (0) in this precise case. And this would address the cases: http://example.org/foo.php?id=42 http://example.org/foo.php?id=bar foo.php: <?php fetchById(int $id) { // ... } fetchById($_GET["id"]); even if $_GET["id"] is replaced by (int) $_GET["id"]; Cheers, Patrick
