Hey Leigh, > Hey Tom, > > Patch looks solid (basically the same as the isset logic with OR > instead of AND). I think it's fairly sane to have this feature because > it compliments isset functionality (although I dislike "empty" > personally - consistency is nice) > > No RFC would be complete without a complaint about naming. > "empty_expressions" ... I'll give you an empty expression! > > But overall +1 on functionality and patch. > > Cheers! > > Leigh.
Thanks for the feedback :) -Tom
